The 9th District Court of Appeals has begun to recognize a pattern of unchecked Prosecutorial Misconduct of assistant prosecutor SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, always endorsed and promoted by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE!
SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, tried the case of State v Gatt before LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, in the Kangaroo Court of Medina County on September 27, 2009 and was found guilty, as usual, DUE TO THE CORRUPT CONDUCT OF SALISBURY AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER!
The docket in the case of State v Gatt, Medina County Kangaroo Court no. 09CR0519, can be found at the Medina County Clerk's website at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/DetailForm.aspx?case=09CR0519 .
A brief review of the docket in case no. 09CR0519 suggests that the alleged criminal offense was investigated by those "crack" officers of the Medina County Sheriff's Office, who have received their advanced police training in the State of Pennsylvania from the KEYSTONE COPS.
Following his unlawful conviction in the Kangaroo Court of Medina County, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DECIDED THAT MR. GATT SHOULD RECEIVE FIVE YEARS IN PRISON.
Accordingly, on October 19, 2009, Mr. Gatt appeared before the COMPLETELY DISHONORABLE AND DISHONEST LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER WHO, FUNCTIONING ALWAYS AS THE "PAVLOV DOG" OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, IMPOSED THE SENTENCE MANDATED BY HOLMAN. LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, SENTENCED MR. GATT TO A TERM OF FIVE YEARS IMPRISONMENT.
Mr. Gatt appealed his conviction, which was recently decided by the 9th District Court of Appeals on October 11, 2011. The Opinion of the 9th District Court of Appeals, State v Gatt, 2011-Ohio-5221, can be found at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-5221.pdf .
At Paragraph 15 of the Opinion, the Court of Appeals summarized, in part:
Aside from the inappropriateness of the remark, the reader will take note of the fact that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND VERY MUCH THE COWARD, boasted in front of the jury, "Don’t hit me, because it might turn out a little different, okay?"
SALISBURY, IN THE COMFORT AND PROTECTION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION, WAS SUFFICIENTLY BOLD AND DARING TO MAKE THIS BOAST AND THREATEN MR. GATT WHEN, IN FACT, SALISBURY WOULD BE THE FIRST TO TURN AND RUN FROM A REAL CONFRONTATION WHEN NOT SURROUNDED BY SAFETY AND SECURITY PROVIDED HIM BY COURTROOM PERSONNEL, INCLUDING MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES.
SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has developed a fierce reputation for taunting and threatening chained and shackled defendants, as well as the mothers and sisters of those same defendants who appear in the Kangaroo court of LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER!
Turning back now to the Opinion in State v Gatt, the 9th District Made this observation about the unchecked pattern of prosecutorial misconduct of SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, all of which is endorse, promoted, and enabled by LAPDOG COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN:
The Office of Disciplinary Conduct of the Ohio Supreme Court, when learning of these additional comments from the 9th District Court of Appeals, will surely have additional fodder when they consider whether or nor to disbar SALISBURY, HOLMAN, and LAPDOG COLLIER.
TO BE SURE, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, LET SALISBURY "GET AWAY WITH IT" ONCE AGAIN, ALL THE WHILE CHEERING SALISBURY ON FROM THE BENCH!
In reviewing the docket at the Clerk of Court website, the blogger takes note of the fact that the Court Reporter requested and received only one extension of time to file the transcript of the proceedings in State v Gatt.
THERE MUST NOT HAVE BEEN MUCH FOR LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY, AND HOLMAN TO TAMPER WITH, ALTER, AND AMEND IN THE GATT TRANSCRIPT.
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, tried the case of State v Gatt before LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, in the Kangaroo Court of Medina County on September 27, 2009 and was found guilty, as usual, DUE TO THE CORRUPT CONDUCT OF SALISBURY AND LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER!
The docket in the case of State v Gatt, Medina County Kangaroo Court no. 09CR0519, can be found at the Medina County Clerk's website at http://www.co.medina.oh.us/medct_epublicnodr/pages/DetailForm.aspx?case=09CR0519 .
A brief review of the docket in case no. 09CR0519 suggests that the alleged criminal offense was investigated by those "crack" officers of the Medina County Sheriff's Office, who have received their advanced police training in the State of Pennsylvania from the KEYSTONE COPS.
Following his unlawful conviction in the Kangaroo Court of Medina County, CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DECIDED THAT MR. GATT SHOULD RECEIVE FIVE YEARS IN PRISON.
Accordingly, on October 19, 2009, Mr. Gatt appeared before the COMPLETELY DISHONORABLE AND DISHONEST LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER WHO, FUNCTIONING ALWAYS AS THE "PAVLOV DOG" OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN, IMPOSED THE SENTENCE MANDATED BY HOLMAN. LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, SENTENCED MR. GATT TO A TERM OF FIVE YEARS IMPRISONMENT.
Mr. Gatt appealed his conviction, which was recently decided by the 9th District Court of Appeals on October 11, 2011. The Opinion of the 9th District Court of Appeals, State v Gatt, 2011-Ohio-5221, can be found at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/9/2011/2011-ohio-5221.pdf .
At Paragraph 15 of the Opinion, the Court of Appeals summarized, in part:
{¶15} During the State’s cross-examination of Mr. Gatt, the prosecutor asked Mr. Gatt
to step down from the stand to reenact the altercation for the jury. For purposes of the
reenactment, the prosecutor played the role of Mr. Topovski. The prosecutor asked Mr. Gatt what he said to Mr. Topovski when he first approached him that night, then he asked him what he did. Mr. Gatt, while apparently walking for the jury, testified that Mr. Topovski “was walking like this.” The prosecutor responded, “Come on. I’m walking up to you. Don’t hit me, because it might turn out a little different, okay? Tell me what you d[id].”
Aside from the inappropriateness of the remark, the reader will take note of the fact that SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AND VERY MUCH THE COWARD, boasted in front of the jury, "Don’t hit me, because it might turn out a little different, okay?"
SALISBURY, IN THE COMFORT AND PROTECTION OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE/MOSQUE & RAILROAD STATION, WAS SUFFICIENTLY BOLD AND DARING TO MAKE THIS BOAST AND THREATEN MR. GATT WHEN, IN FACT, SALISBURY WOULD BE THE FIRST TO TURN AND RUN FROM A REAL CONFRONTATION WHEN NOT SURROUNDED BY SAFETY AND SECURITY PROVIDED HIM BY COURTROOM PERSONNEL, INCLUDING MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES.
SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, has developed a fierce reputation for taunting and threatening chained and shackled defendants, as well as the mothers and sisters of those same defendants who appear in the Kangaroo court of LAPDOG JUDGE COLLIER!
Turning back now to the Opinion in State v Gatt, the 9th District Made this observation about the unchecked pattern of prosecutorial misconduct of SALISBURY, THE PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, all of which is endorse, promoted, and enabled by LAPDOG COLLIER and CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN:
{¶18} This Court’s review of the transcript in this matter revealed many troublingSo, within a matter of a few short months, the 9th District Court of Appeals has commented for a second time on SALISBURY'S HABIT OF ENGAGING IN "WIDESPREAD IMPROPER CONDUCT."
comments by the prosecutor. Although not amounting to reversible error, the prosecutor made numerous inappropriate comments throughout the course of this trial. In addition to the threat Mr. Gatt has assigned as error, the prosecutor repeatedly expressed his personal belief regarding the credibility of witnesses (during direct-examination of his own witness, cross-examination of the defendant, and closing argument) and frequently introduced facts not in evidence via his “questions” to various witnesses. This Court has previously addressed this prosecutor’s tendency to engage in “widespread improper conduct” in the courtroom. State v. Johnson, 9th Dist. No. 09CA0054-M, 2011-Ohio-3623, at ¶62, 42-70. This Court, however, released the Johnson opinion on July 25, 2011, ten months after the trial in this matter. As Mr. Gatt’s trial took place before we expressed our concern about this practice, we will not further discuss the issue at this time.
The Office of Disciplinary Conduct of the Ohio Supreme Court, when learning of these additional comments from the 9th District Court of Appeals, will surely have additional fodder when they consider whether or nor to disbar SALISBURY, HOLMAN, and LAPDOG COLLIER.
TO BE SURE, LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, LET SALISBURY "GET AWAY WITH IT" ONCE AGAIN, ALL THE WHILE CHEERING SALISBURY ON FROM THE BENCH!
In reviewing the docket at the Clerk of Court website, the blogger takes note of the fact that the Court Reporter requested and received only one extension of time to file the transcript of the proceedings in State v Gatt.
THERE MUST NOT HAVE BEEN MUCH FOR LAPDOG COLLIER, SALISBURY, AND HOLMAN TO TAMPER WITH, ALTER, AND AMEND IN THE GATT TRANSCRIPT.
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
