LAPDOG COLLIER CAUGHT AGAIN TAMPERING WITH A TRANSCRIPT?

A review and analysis of the docket of David Reed presents another interesting development, suggesting more nefarious conduct by LAPDOG MEDINA JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE.


On September 19, 2011, Mr. Reed filed a motion with LAPDOG COLLIER to vacate his unlawful sentence and to re-sentence him in accord with the law of the State of Ohio.


Pictured below is Mr. Reed's motion filed with LAPDOG COLLIER:

As the reader can plainly see, Mr. Reed alleges that LAPDOG COLLIER, THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, sentenced Mr. Reed to 12 months on Count 1 and to 5 months on Count 2, for a total of 17 months to be served.  Mr. Reed then complains that, after his sentencing hearing, someone drew LAPDOG COLLIER'S imposed sentence of 5 months on Count 2 was unlawful and that LAPDOG COLLIER unilaterally changed the docketing entry to conform with statute, thus effectively changing Mr. Reed's sentence to 11 months on Count 1 and to 6 months on Count

2, all outside the presence of Mr. Reed.

GIVEN LAPDOG COLLIER'S COMPLETE LACK OF HONESTY AND INTEGRITY, MR. REED'S CLAIM IS QUITE BELIEVABLE.

Pictured below is LAPDOG COLLIER'S denial of Mr. Reed's motion, establishing once again that LAPDOG COLLIER is unable to read with any reasonable level of comprehension:

As the reader can tell, LAPDOG COLLIER CLAIMS TO HAVE REVIEWED THE "RECORD" ("OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT") and dismissed Mr. Reed's motion on the basis that Mr. Reed was in court at the time that LAPDOG COLLIER pronounced the sentence imposed by CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY DINO HOLMAN.


Two issues immediately jump out at the reader:
1)  LAPDOG COLLIER completely avoids the primary issue of unlawfully changing the structure of Mr. Reed's sentence outside the presence of Mr. Reed; and
2)  LAPDOG COLLIER claims he reviewed the "record."


LAPDOG COLLIER'S second claim, that he reviewed the record, raises another interesting questions:
1)  Did LAPDOG COLLIER really review the record?
2)  Does the actual record support Mr. Reed's contention?


MORE IMPORTANTLY, HAS LAPDOG COLLIER TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT TO COMPORT WITH HIS DOCKETED ENTRY, JUST AS HE TAMPERED WITH, ALTERED, AND AMENDED THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE BEING PROFILED AT THIS BLOG?


ONLY THE OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, UNDER CONTRACT TO LAPDOG COLLIER, KNOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT THAT, AND SHE'S NOT TALKING, AT LEAST IN THE PRESENT MOMENT.


MUCH MORE TO COME ...