Tuesday, February 10, 2015

ROCKET SCIENCE IS NOT LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S STRONG SUIT !!!

Shown below is the THIRTY-FOURTH installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:



Publius” Made Certain Damning Admissions in His Messages to Inspector Hartman.


“Publius” has made certain admissions in his electronic message to Inspector Hartman, some damning and against self-interest.
In a January 1, 2011 email message, bearing the return email address of Steve Martinez-johnson, “Publius” wrote in pertinent part:
I am the poster known as Publius.”
In a January 2, 2011 Craigslist posting directed to Inspector Hartman and captioned “Some real case proof similar to the Medina Corruption blog,” “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“While I understand that Brady v Maryland (1963) says they must do this [turn over exculpatory evidence], it is almost impossible to enforce which is why this abuse has been going on [in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas].”

In another January 2, 2011 message to Inspector Hartman, bearing the return email address of Steve Martinez-johnson, “Publius” wrote in pertinent part:
“Read the Open Letter to Paul Hartman yet
SKIPPY
Publius
Sam
Stevo

I have many names, but you can call me Anonymous”

In a February 22, 2011 email message with the return address of “Paul D,” “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“How about coming down to the Medina County Courthouse on Thursday and protesting the ‘unconstitutional’  prosecutions going on here.”

“Then we will arrest you and you can join your friends in jail.”

In a February 13, 2011 Craigslist posting captioned “The Hartman Files (Court house),” “Publius” wrote in pertinent part:
“[I]t is obvious that the assistant prosecutor appears less than competent, and there was obvious bad witness testimony given that the woman who 911ed him in (sic) was on medication for depression and she appears to not even have seen Paul’s son.  Regardless, Paul is still presenting wacko conspiracy theories that his son was entrapped by an undercover agent in the jail for one.  There does seem a chance if [Inspector] Hartman was not such a douch (sic)with his blog that his son’s conviction could be overturned on appeal, the blog if admitted as evidence, will damn his son’s chances.

In a February 14, 2011 Craigslist posting captioned “The Hartman Files continued,”  “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“[T]he house that Matthew “broke into” was that of friends of Paul Hartman, the wife who lived there had preexisting mental problems and hated the younger Hartman.”

“Publius” cites accurately facts that were revealed at trial, out of the hearing of the jury.  “Publius’” email message of February 14 continues:
“[T]here could have been a chance that the conviction could have been overturned on appeal.  But thanks to the blog, and those n here who reported it (I was one of them!) it won’t happen.”

In a February 21, 2011 Craigslist posting captioned “Re: The Medina Loony” (sic), “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“The elder Hartman is pissed that his son was basically framed by testimony from a depressed woman on prescription who never even saw the crimes described.  The problem is that the elder Hartman has not assisted with his son’s appeal and decided to make rants on his blog an on here about how the prosecutor and the judge are ‘corrupt.’”

Judge Collier well knew, from Inspector Hartman’s testimony pertaining to the 9-1-1 call that witness Kim Leigthon conceded to the dispatcher that she had not seen the Defendant prior to and during the purported incident.  The judge also knew that he prevented defense counsel from cross-examining Kim Leighton about her mental condition and her medication regime, issues that Judge Collier deliberately deleted from the official transcript.  This admission by “Publius” is no less than a ”smoking gun,” proving Judge Collier’s bad faith.
In a March 18, 2011 email message to Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part;
“Stop complaining about how hard it is to escape conviction. If we must keep order among the racial minorities and bikers like the two Hells Angels we busted, occasionally the innocent must be convicted. But we must maintain order, we cannot have chaos in our county.”

“Publius” has demonstrated his complete disregard and disdain for the protections that should be afforded to citizens by the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights in the Medina County courts.
In a June 15, 2011email message to Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
She [Defendant’s wife] lost her “spousal privilege” because she did not turn us on well enough.  You all knew the deal, should have considered playing along.”

In a June 27, 2011 email message to Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“Why must you dishonor us, we are doing our jobs. The Constitution is a scrap of paper that is just guidelines, not rules.  We need aggressive prosecution, or crime will spin out of control.  If you knew the truth you would understand.”

“Publius” has once again demonstrated his utter contempt for the United States Constitution and equates “aggressive prosecution” with violation of defendants’ constitutional rights.  Inspector Hartman supervised the Violent Crimes Squad of the Postal Inspection Service in Cleveland, Ohio and has a well-founded understanding of crime and criminal environments.  He never saw fit to violate the constitutional rights of suspects to “win” unlawful convictions, as is the usual and customary practice in Medina County.
In a June 29, 2011 email message to Inspector Hartman. “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“Hey old man, maybe you should know that you will lose the case on appeal, we know that already.

It is obvious that “Publius” made this prediction with the knowledge that he had materially altered the “official” transcript with the intent to deprive Defendant  Hartman of a fair hearing on appeal.
In a July 9, 2011 email message to Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“RANT ALL YOU WANT, OLD MAN!  YOU WILL NEVER TAKE THE SYSTEM DOWN! WE WILL BURY YOU!

In a July 22, 2011 email message to Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“I will let you in on a little secret.  NOTHING YOU DO WILL STOP US!  SUCK IT UP, COWARD!”

In an October 31, 2011 email message to Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“Hey old man, we got your guy [Judge Robert Brown] out!  We’ll get one of [Erie County Prosecutor] Baxter’s friends in here.  Do you not get it? We own the whole thing!  All the way to the Federal Appeals Court!

The Medina County Prosecutor filed an affidavit to disqualify the Honorable Robert J. Brown, then sitting by assignment in this case, when he learned that Judge Brown had scheduled a Brady hearing to hear evidence that the Medina County Prosecutor had withheld discoverable evidence in Mr. Hartman’s first trial.  Erie County Prosecutor Kevin Baxter, referenced in “Publius’” email message, has developed a reputation for being “ethically challenged” and is a crony of Medina County Prosecutor Dean Holman.
A compilation of the cited and similar electronic messages that “Publius” directed to Inspector Hartman is attached as Exhibit Thirty-Six.
WHILE THE MANY ADMISSIONS THAT LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER MADE AGAINST HIS OWN SELF-INTEREST, TWO OF THEM STAND OUT AMONG ALL THE OTHERS: " YOU WILL NEVER TAKE THE SYSTEM DOWN!   NOTHING YOU DO WILL STOP US!"
"PUBLIUS" COLLIER HAS RECENTLY BEEN FORCED TO RETHINK THAT POSITION.  IT CERTAINLY APPEARS THAT THE BLOGGER, AND OTHERS, ARE WELL ON THEIR WAY TO TAKING DOWN THE "SYSTEM" OF CORRUPTION IN MEDINA COUNTY, UNTIL NOW FIRMLY CONTROLLED BY THE MEDINA REPUBLICRATS.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment