Publius” Made Certain Damning Admissions in
His Messages to Inspector Hartman.
“Publius” has made certain admissions in
his electronic message to Inspector Hartman, some damning and against
self-interest.
In a January 1, 2011 email message, bearing
the return email address of Steve
Martinez-johnson, “Publius” wrote in pertinent part:
“I
am the poster known as Publius.”
In a January 2, 2011 Craigslist posting
directed to Inspector Hartman and captioned “Some real case proof similar to
the Medina Corruption blog,” “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“While I understand
that Brady v Maryland (1963) says they must do this [turn over exculpatory
evidence], it is almost impossible to enforce which is why this abuse has
been going on [in the Medina County Court of Common Pleas].”
In another January 2, 2011 message to
Inspector Hartman, bearing the return email address of Steve Martinez-johnson, “Publius” wrote in pertinent part:
“Read
the Open Letter to Paul Hartman yet
SKIPPY
Publius
Sam
Stevo
I have many names, but
you can call me Anonymous”
In a February 22, 2011 email message with
the return address of “Paul D,” “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“How about coming down
to the Medina County Courthouse on Thursday and protesting the
‘unconstitutional’ prosecutions going on
here.”
“Then we will arrest
you and you can join your friends in jail.”
In a February 13, 2011 Craigslist posting
captioned “The Hartman Files (Court house),” “Publius” wrote in pertinent part:
“[I]t is obvious that
the assistant prosecutor appears less than competent, and there was obvious bad
witness testimony given that the woman who 911ed him in (sic) was on medication
for depression and she appears to not even have seen Paul’s son. Regardless, Paul is still presenting wacko conspiracy
theories that his son was entrapped by an undercover agent in the jail for
one. There does seem a chance if
[Inspector] Hartman was not such a douch (sic)with his blog that his son’s
conviction could be overturned on appeal, the blog if admitted as evidence,
will damn his son’s chances.
In a February 14, 2011 Craigslist posting captioned
“The Hartman Files continued,” “Publius”
wrote, in pertinent part:
“[T]he house that
Matthew “broke into” was that of friends of Paul Hartman, the wife who lived
there had preexisting mental problems and hated the younger Hartman.”
“Publius” cites accurately facts that
were revealed at trial, out of the hearing of the jury. “Publius’” email message of February 14
continues:
“[T]here could have
been a chance that the conviction could have been overturned on appeal. But thanks to the blog, and those n here who
reported it (I was one of them!) it won’t happen.”
In a February 21, 2011 Craigslist posting
captioned “Re: The Medina Loony” (sic), “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“The elder Hartman is
pissed that his son was basically framed by testimony from a depressed woman
on prescription who never even saw the crimes described. The problem is that the elder Hartman has
not assisted with his son’s appeal and decided to make rants on his blog an on
here about how the prosecutor and the judge are ‘corrupt.’”
Judge Collier well knew, from Inspector
Hartman’s testimony pertaining to the 9-1-1 call that witness Kim Leigthon
conceded to the dispatcher that she had not
seen the Defendant prior to and during the purported incident. The judge also knew that he prevented defense
counsel from cross-examining Kim Leighton about her mental condition and her
medication regime, issues that Judge Collier deliberately deleted from the official transcript. This admission by “Publius” is no less than a
”smoking gun,” proving Judge
Collier’s bad faith.
In a March 18, 2011 email message to
Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part;
“Stop complaining
about how hard it is to escape conviction. If we must keep order among the
racial minorities and bikers like the two Hells Angels we busted, occasionally the innocent must be
convicted. But we must maintain order, we cannot have chaos in our
county.”
“Publius” has demonstrated his complete
disregard and disdain for the protections that should be afforded to citizens by the United States Constitution
and the Bill of Rights in the Medina County courts.
In a June 15, 2011email message to
Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“She [Defendant’s
wife] lost her “spousal privilege” because she did not turn us on well
enough. You all knew the deal, should
have considered playing along.”
In a June 27, 2011 email message to
Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“Why must you dishonor
us, we are doing our jobs. The
Constitution is a scrap of paper that is just guidelines, not rules. We need aggressive prosecution, or
crime will spin out of control. If you
knew the truth you would understand.”
“Publius” has once again demonstrated his utter
contempt for the United States Constitution and equates “aggressive
prosecution” with violation of defendants’ constitutional rights. Inspector Hartman supervised the Violent Crimes
Squad of the Postal Inspection Service in Cleveland, Ohio and has a
well-founded understanding of crime and criminal environments. He never saw fit to violate the
constitutional rights of suspects to “win” unlawful convictions, as is the
usual and customary practice in Medina County.
In a June 29, 2011 email message to
Inspector Hartman. “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“Hey old man, maybe
you should know that you will lose the case on appeal, we know that already.”
It is obvious that “Publius” made this prediction with
the knowledge that he had materially
altered the “official” transcript with the intent to deprive Defendant Hartman of a fair hearing on appeal.
In a July 9, 2011 email message to
Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“RANT ALL YOU WANT, OLD MAN!
YOU WILL NEVER TAKE THE SYSTEM
DOWN! WE WILL BURY YOU!
In a July 22, 2011 email message to
Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“I will let you
in on a little secret. NOTHING YOU DO
WILL STOP US! SUCK IT UP, COWARD!”
In an October 31, 2011 email message to
Inspector Hartman, “Publius” wrote, in pertinent part:
“Hey old man, we got
your guy [Judge Robert Brown] out! We’ll
get one of [Erie County Prosecutor] Baxter’s friends in here. Do you not get it? We own the whole thing! All
the way to the Federal Appeals Court!”
The Medina County Prosecutor filed an
affidavit to disqualify the Honorable Robert J. Brown, then sitting by
assignment in this case, when he learned that Judge Brown had scheduled a Brady hearing to hear evidence that the
Medina County Prosecutor had withheld discoverable evidence in Mr. Hartman’s
first trial. Erie County Prosecutor
Kevin Baxter, referenced in “Publius’” email message, has developed a
reputation for being “ethically challenged” and is a crony of Medina County
Prosecutor Dean Holman.
A compilation of the cited and similar
electronic messages that “Publius” directed to Inspector Hartman is attached as
Exhibit Thirty-Six.
WHILE THE MANY ADMISSIONS THAT LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER MADE AGAINST HIS OWN SELF-INTEREST, TWO OF THEM STAND OUT AMONG ALL THE OTHERS: " YOU WILL NEVER TAKE THE SYSTEM
DOWN! NOTHING YOU DO
WILL STOP US!"
"PUBLIUS" COLLIER HAS RECENTLY BEEN FORCED TO RETHINK THAT POSITION. IT CERTAINLY APPEARS THAT THE BLOGGER, AND OTHERS, ARE WELL ON THEIR WAY TO TAKING DOWN THE "SYSTEM" OF CORRUPTION IN MEDINA COUNTY, UNTIL NOW FIRMLY CONTROLLED BY THE MEDINA REPUBLICRATS.
No comments:
Post a Comment