Thursday, February 9, 2017

JAGOFF ATTORNEY, WHO SUED HIS CLIENTS ON BEHALF OF THOSE SAME CLIENTS, OFFENDED BY THE FACTS AND EVIDENCE OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME PUBLISHED AT THIS BLOG ; ARGUES "ALTERNATIVE FACTS"

WHAT A HOOT!

ONE OF THE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS WHO, AS SHOWN IN A PRIOR POST, SUED HIS OWN CLIENTS ON BEHALF OF THOSE SAME CLIENTS, FEELS AGGRIEVED THAT THIS BLOG HAS HAD THE AUDACITY TO PUBLISH THE FACTS AND THE TRUTH PERTAINING TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME !!!  Please see prior post at this blog captioned UNINFORMED, APATHETIC VOTERS ELECTED TO RETAIN AN ILLITERATE MORON ON THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TO KEEP THE SEAT WARM !!! easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2017/01/uninformed-apathetic-voters-elected-to.html

HERE'S THE SCOOP!

ON JANUARY 24, 2016 ONE OF THE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS WHO HAS FILED MEDINA CASE NO. O8CIV0502, SUING HIS OWN CLIENTS ON BEHALF OF THOSE SAME CLIENTS (DUH!!!), SERVED A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE UPON ONE OF THE VICTIMS OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME

THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY FILED THE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF WITH THE CLERK OF THE MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ON JANUARY 26, 2017.

THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IS SHOWN BELOW.








































THE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF APPEARS TO BE RATHER LATE IN COMING GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE DOCKET IN MEDINA CASE NO. 08CIV0502 REVEALS THAT THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY LAST FILED A MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE ON MAY 15, 2013!

KNOWING THAT, UNDER THE LAW, A COURT SPEAKS ONLY THROUGH ITS DOCKET, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY HAS FILED ANY SHOW CAUSE MOTION SINCE THE DATE OF MAY 15, 2013.

JAGOFF ATTORNEY DEMONSTRATES HE IS JUST ONE MORE BULLSHIT ARTIST (OBVIOUSLY)!

LET'S LOOK AT SOME OF THE "ALTERNATIVE FACTS" HE ARGUES IN HIS MOTION.

FOR PURPOSES OF CLARIFICATION, THE PHRASE "ALTERNATIVE FACTS" IS AN EUPHEMISM FOR THE TERM FOR THE TERM "BULLSHIT."

DRAWING THE READERS' ATTENTION TO PARAGRAPH #2 OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF, THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEYCLAIMS THAT A "CUSTOMER" OF HIS CLIENT DREW THE CLIENT'S ATTENTION TO THIS BLOG WHICH, HE CLAIMS. IS AUTHORED BY A VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME AND THAT THIS BLOG PUBLISHES "CONFIDENTIAL" INFORMATION.

THAT IS JUST A CLAIM OF "ALTERNATIVE FACTS" (BULLSHIT)!

ON MONDAY MORNING, JANUARY 23, 2017, THE BLOGGER CHECKED THE STATISTICAL DATA FOR THIS BLOG, MAINTAINED BY BLOGGER, THE WEBSITE WHICH PUBLISHES THIS BLOG.  THE BLOGGER'S ATTENTION WAS IMMEDIATELY DRAWN TO THE FACT THAT, BETWEEN THE HOURS OF SUNDAY AT 8:00 PM AND MONDAY MORNING, BLOGGER RECORDED 672 PAGEVIEWS AT THIS BLOG, WHICH WAS HIGHLY IRREGULAR.

GIVEN THE FACT THAT, AT THE TIME, THIS BLOG HAD PUBLISHED A CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF 659 POSTS, IT BECAME ABUNDANTLY CLEAR THAT SOMEONE HAD READ AND REVIEWED EACH AND EVERY POST AT THIS BLOG IN THE BRIEF PERIOD DESCRIBED.  THAT, ONCE AGAIN, WAS HIGHLY UNUSUAL.

IN RETROSPECT, IT IS MORE LIKELY THAT THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY TOOK THE TIME TO REVIEW THIS BLOG IN ITS ENTIRETY.

THAT BEING SAID, IT IS CLEAR THAT THIS BLOG IS NOT AUTHORED BY GREGG DEPEW, ONE OF THE VICTIMS OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, CONTRARY TO THE "ALTERNATIVE FACTS" ALLEGED BY THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY.

RATHER, AS ANYONE WHO HAS FOLLOWED THIS BLOG WELL KNOWS, THIS BLOG IS AUTHORED AND PUBLISHED BY AN HONORABLY RETIRED FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHOSE SON WAS RAILROADED AT TRIAL BY FORMER COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN AND CORRUPT PHILANDERING, ILLEGITIMATE "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER WHO DELIBERATELY DEPRIVED THE BLOGGER'S SON OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AND HIS PROTECTIONS UNDER THE LAW.  THAT, OF COURSE, IS THE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PRACTICE IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM AS THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY WELL KNOWS.

NOW, REALIZING THAT IT WAS THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY WHO LIKELY DISCOVERED BLOG POSTS REVEALING THE ACTUAL FACTS AND EVIDENCE OF UNLAWFUL CONDUCT PERTAINING TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME (TO WHICH HE OBJECTS), THIS JAGOFF CLAIMS THAT THIS BLOG WAS DISCOVERED BY A CUSTOMER OF HIS CLIENT.

DOES IT SEEM LIKELY THAT A "CUSTOMER" WOULD TAKE THE TIME AND EFFORT TO READ AND REVIEW ALL 659 POSTS AT THIS BLOG?  THE BLOGGER THINKS NOT!

MOREOVER, THIS JAGOFF CLAIMS THAT THIS BLOG CONTAINS "CONFIDENTIAL" INFORMATION.

SAY WHAT?

APPARENTLY, THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY IS NOT QUITE UP TO DATE WITH HIS OWN CASE FILE.  THE BLOGGER CAN ONLY SPECULATE THAT THIS JAGOFF REFERS TO CERTAIN DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME WHICH THE BLOGGER HAS PUBLISHED AT THIS BLOG.

ANY ALL DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED AT THIS BLOG ARE TAKEN FROM PUBLICLY FILED EXHIBITS FOUND WITHIN THE COURT FILINGS IN CASE NO. 08CIV0502, EASILY LOCATED AT THE WEBSITE OF THE CLERK OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURT.

IN FACT, THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY JUST DOESN'T SEEM ALL THAT BRIGHT, PARTICULARLY WHEN HE FILED MEDINA CASE NO. 08CIV0502, SUING HIS CLIENTS ON BEHALF OF THOSE SAME CLIENTS. 

IN REALITY, NONE OF THIS IS ROCKET SCIENCE!!!


No comments:

Post a Comment