"THE MEDINA HORROR PICTURE SHOW" NOW SHOWING IN KANGAROO COURTROOM #1 AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION.

THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW, STILL REGULARLY SHOWN AT THE CEDAR-LEE CINEMA IN CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, IS SAID TO BE A CULT CLASSIC.

THE MEDINA HORROR PICTURE SHOW, HOWEVER, IS AN OCCULT CLASSIC WHERE THE DARK FORCES OF THE UNIVERSE CUSTOMARILY PREVAIL.

RESIDENTS CAN EASILY CATCH A DAILY SHOWING OF THE MEDINA HORROR PICTURE SHOW IN "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER'S KANGAROO COURTROOM #1 OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION.

NOW, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER PRESENTS WITH NO SMALL LEVEL OF IRONY WITH HIS DOUBLE-TALK AND DELIBERATE VIOLATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF OHIO.

HERE IS BUT ONE EXAMPLE OF THE HYPOCRISY OF THIS DOUBLE-TALKING MORON WHO WOULD NOT MAKE A DECENT BOIL ON THE ASS OF A REAL JUDGE.

IN ONE OF THE MORE THAN 400 OFFENSIVE EMAIL MESSAGES "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER SENT TO THIS BLOG, "WEASELPECKER" WROTE THE FOLLOWING;

"STOP COMPLAINING HOW HARD IT IS TO ESCAPE CONVICTION.  IF WE MUST KEEP ORDER AMONG THE RACIAL MINORITIES AND THE BIKERS LIKE THE TWO HELLS ANGELS WE BUSTED, OCCASIONALLY THE INNOCENT MUST BE CONVICTED.  BUT WE MUST MAINTAIN ORDER, WE CANNOT HAVE CHAOS IN OUR COUNTY."

THERE IS NO SLIGHT LEVEL OF IRONY IN HIS DEFENSE OF THE CONVICTION OF THE INNOCENT, IN WHICH HE PLAYS SUCH A PIVOTAL ROLE,

AS READERS OF THIS BLOG WILL ACKNOWLEDGE, THE PRIMARY MANNER OF PRESERVING ORDER, PARTICULARLY IN THE COURTS OUTSIDE MEDINA COUNTY (WITH NUMEROUS GLARING EXCEPTIONS), IS TO CLING TO THE LAW AND THE RULES OF COURTROOM PROCEDURE.

"WEASELPECKER" COLLIER DOES NEITHER!

PRESENTED BELOW, EXCERPTED FROM THE BLOGGER'S COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OF "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER  FILED IN THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT.

THE BELOW EXCERPT, TAKEN FROM THE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT MEMORIALIZES SOME, BUT NOT ALL OF THE RULES OF COURT THAT "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER VIOLATED  IN ORDER TO SECURE AN UNJUST AND UNLAWFUL CONVICTION OF A FACTUALLY INNOCENT CITIZEN.

Collier Violated Numerous Ohio Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure.  There are no Rules of Evidence enforced against the prosecutor by Collier. 

Following is a list of some, but not all, of the Rules, which COLLIER ignored and violated at “trial”:

Criminal Procedure Rule   1 : Scope of Rules: Applicability, etc.

Criminal Procedure Rule   3 : Complaint

Criminal Procedure Rule   4 : Warrant or Summons; Arrest

Criminal Procedure Rule   6 : Grand Jury

Criminal Procedure Rule   7 : The Indictment and the Information

Criminal Procedure Rule 12 :  Pleadings and Motions Before Trial

Criminal Procedure Rule 16 :  Discovery and Inspection

Criminal Procedure Rule 29 : Motion for Acquittal

Criminal Procedure Rule 30 : Instructions

Criminal Procedure Rule 31 : Verdict

Criminal Procedure Rule 33 : New Trial

Criminal Procedure Rule 46 : Bail

Evidence Rule 101  : Scope of Rules; Applicability, etc.

Evidence Rule 103  : Rulings on Evidence

Evidence Rule 401  : Relevant Evidence

Evidence Rule 402  : Relevant Evidence Generally Admissible, etc.

Evidence Rule 403  : Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice….

Evidence Rule 404  : Character Evidence not Admissible to Prove Conduct, etc.

Evidence Rule 501  : Privileges: General Rule

Evidence Rule 601  : General Rule of Competency (of witnesses)

Evidence Rule 601(B) : Spouse Testifying

Evidence Rule 602  : Lack of Personal Knowledge

Evidence Rule 605  : Competency of Judge as Witness

Evidence Rule 607  : Impeachment

Evidence Rule 609  : Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime

Evidence Rule 611  : Mode and Order of Interrogation and Presentation

Evidence Rule 615  : Separation and Exclusion of Witnesses

Evidence Rule 616  : Methods of Impeachment

Evidence Rule 704  : Opinion on Ultimate Issue

         Further, COLLIER violated the following provisions of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct:

Canon 1:

         Rule 1.1      Compliance with the law

         Rule 1.2      Promoting Confidence in the Judiciary

Canon 2:

         Rule 2.2      Impartiality and Fairness

         Rule 2.3 (A), (B), C)  Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment

         Rule 2.4 (B), (C)  External Influences on Judicial Conduct

         Rule 2.5 (A) Competence, Diligence, and Cooperation

         Rule 2.6 (A) Ensuring the Right to be Heard

         Rule 2.8 (A), (B)  Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors

         Rule 2.9 (A), (B)  Ex Parte Contacts

         Rule 2.10 (B)  Judicial Statements on Pending Cases

         Rule 2.15 (B)  Responding to Lawyer Misconduct

THE ABOVE DEMONSTRATES THE MANNER IN WHICH "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, FORMERLY DINO HOE-MAN'S LAPDOG, AND CURRENTLY THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND TOWN WHORE, WOULD HAVE ALL OF THE UNINFORMED AND APATHETIC MEDINA COUNTY ELECTORATE BELIEVE HE MAINTAINS "ORDER," BY DEPRIVING ACCUSED INDIVIDUALS OF THEIR OTHERWISE GUARANTEED PROTECTIONS UNDER LAW AND MAKING EVERY CONCEIVABLE EFFORT TO CONVICT INNOCENT CITIZENS.

WHAT A COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY CORRUPT MORON AND A WASTE OF GOOD AIR WHO, IN FACT, PROMOTES CHAOS IN THE "COURTS" OF THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM!

WHAT A DOUCHEBAG!!!