ANOTHER SNAPPY RETORT FROM SALISBURY!

I find it more than interesting that assistant prosecutor SCOTT SALISBURY a/k/a SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) has chosen the email address of CORRUPTGOV216@AOL.COM to send more of his "anonymous" comments to this blog, which has certainly taken all of the courage he could muster.


There is no little irony here, although, to be precise, SALISBURY should have used the correct area code: 330.


HERE'S THE LATEST SNAPPY RETORT FROM SALISBURY:

It is apparent you have gone completely mad! Sounds like Barney is a scumbag hillbilly who deserves what he got and you are just trying to spin the facts in a matter that would be beneficial to Barney. Your blog sucks, you suck, go to hell.

By corruptgov216 on "WE GOTTA ARREST HIM FOR SOMETHING, BUT I'M NOT SU... at 9:02 AM

There are really a few interesting features about SALISBURY's latest "anonymous" comment.

First of all, you will take note of the fact that SALISBURY's "anonymous" comment was sent to the blog at 9:02 am on January 27, 2011, well within his scheduled "work hours."  Once again, SALISBURY appears to be engaging in his little diatribe on the taxpayers' dime, unless he has been SUSPENDED FOR HIS UNSEEMLY CONDUCT, WHICH IS CLEARLY UNBECOMING A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE.

That prospect seems unlikely, however, since SALISBURY is a chip off of HOLMAN's block.

Next, he refers to "Barney" as a "hillbilly."  You may wish to consider there are no references to "Barney" at the blog, and certainly no use of the term "hillbilly."

Perhaps, SALISBURY refers to the Defendant, whom he and COLLIER knowingly and willfully deprived of a fair trial, as the facts and the evidence will clearly show, as this account unfolds at this blog.

Lastly, SALISBURY speaks of "spinning the facts," which I find more than amusing.  The deputy who "investigated" this case expended a total of 36 minutes doing so and wote a report that is hardly comprehensive.  


Of course, since there was NO COMPETENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A CONVICTION, SALISBURY, WITH THE FULL APPROVAL OF COLLIER, HAD TO REACH DEEPLY INTO HIS BAG OF TRICKS AND MANUFACTURED A LITTLE "EVIDENCE" OF HIS OWN, INTRODUCE PERJURED TESTIMONY FROM A "WITNESS" WHO OBSERVED NOTHING, AND WITHHELD FAVORABLE, EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE FROM THE DEFENDANT.


SALISBURY is simply unaccustomed to honestly dealing with the facts and the truth ... it's against HOLMAN's office policy.

THOSE ARE THE FACTS, MUCH TO SALISBURY's DISMAY, THAT WILL BE PRESENTED HERE!

MUCH MORE TO COME .....