THE WINDOW TO THE "SOUL" OF CORRUPT JUDGE COLLIER!

It is often said that the eyes are the window to the soul.  Whether or not that may be true, I would suggest that the only viable means to look into the soul of a judge is by simply gauging how closely he or she adheres to the law, the Rules of Criminal Procedure and Evidence, and the Canons of Ethics.

Having posited that theory, I present here facts as to how well TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER has demonstrated that he is completely unfit to sit in judgment of anyone.

Following are my personal observation of what was purported to be a "trial" before COLLIER.

Collier Ignored and Violated Numerous Ohio Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure.  There are no Rules of Evidence enforced against the prosecutor by Collier. 

Following is a list of some, but not all, of the Rules, which COLLIER ignored and violated at “trial”:

Criminal Procedure Rule   1 : Scope of Rules: Applicability, etc.

Criminal Procedure Rule   3 : Complaint

Criminal Procedure Rule   4 : Warrant or Summons; Arrest

Criminal Procedure Rule   6 :  Grand Jury

Criminal Procedure Rule   7 :  The Indictment and the Information

Criminal Procedure Rule 12 :  Pleadings and Motions Before Trial

Criminal Procedure Rule 16 :  Discovery and Inspection

Criminal Procedure Rule 29 :  Motion for Acquittal

Criminal Procedure Rule 30 :  Instructions

Criminal Procedure Rule 31 :  Verdict

Criminal Procedure Rule 33 :  New Trial

Criminal Procedure Rule 46 :  Bail

Evidence Rule 101  :  Scope of Rules; Applicability, etc.

Evidence Rule 103  :  Rulings on Evidence

Evidence Rule 401  :  Relevant Evidence

Evidence Rule 402  :  Relevant Evidence Generally Admissible, etc.

Evidence Rule 403  :  Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice….

Evidence Rule 404  :  Character Evidence not Admissible to Prove Conduct, etc.

Evidence Rule 501  :  Privileges: General Rule

Evidence Rule 601  :  General Rule of Competency (of witnesses)

Evidence Rule 601(B) : Spouse Testifying

Evidence Rule 602  :  Lack of Personal Knowledge

Evidence Rule 605  :  Competency of Judge as Witness

Evidence Rule 607  :  Impeachment

Evidence Rule 609  :  Impeachment by Evidence of Conviction of Crime

Evidence Rule 611  :  Mode and Order of Interrogation and Presentation

Evidence Rule 615  :  Separation and Exclusion of Witnesses

Evidence Rule 616  :  Methods of Impeachment

Evidence Rule 704  :  Opinion on Ultimate Issue

         Further, COLLIER violated the following provisions of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct:

Canon 1:

         Rule 1.1         Compliance with the law

         Rule 1.2         Promoting Confidence in the Judiciary

Canon 2:

         Rule 2.2         Impartiality and Fairness

         Rule 2.3 (A), (B), C)  Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment

         Rule 2.4 (B), (C)  External Influences on Judicial Conduct

         Rule 2.5 (A)         Competence, Diligence, and Cooperation

         Rule 2.6 (A)         Ensuring the Right to be Heard

         Rule 2.8 (A), (B)  Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors

         Rule 2.9 (A), (B)  Ex Parte Contacts

         Rule 2.10 (B)  Judicial Statements on Pending Cases

         Rule 2.15 (B)  Responding to Lawyer Misconduct

Should you wish to read these Rules and Canons, you may find them at these links:

The Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure can be found at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/criminal/CriminalProcedure.pdf

The Ohio Rules of Evidence can be found at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/evidence/evidence.pdf


The Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, which sets out the judicial canons of ethics, or in COLLIER's case, the lack thereof, can be found at
http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/conduct/judcond0309.pdf

BASED UPON MY PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS, THE "SOUL" OF TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE COLLIER MUST BE A VERY DARK AND DESOLATE PLACE WITH ABSOLUTELY NO REDEEMING VALUE WHATSOEVER.


MUCH MORE TO COME ....