A rivalry continues to brew over at the Medina County Courthouse/Mosque & Railroad Station. Simmering below the surface, not necessarily from public view, is a love triangle involving Medina County judges and prosecutors.
It would appear that CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER, and CORRUPT MEDIA COUNTY PROSECUTORS have been competing by their displays of affection for MISS CONDUCT!
MISS CONDUCT is the goal and desire of all of these CORRUPT "PUBLIC OFFICIALS!" One has to wonder whether the charms of MISS CONDUCT might be reasonably worth the ultimate price.
Cited below is language taken from a brief filed by defense counsel in the context of a trial before TOTALLY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY JUDGE CHRISTOPHER COLLIER regarding the infatuation of assistant prosecutor SALISBURY a/k/a SLEAZEBURY (for obvious reasons) with MISS CONDUCT. This language properly put COLLIER on notice of the deficiencies of a trial, as if he didn't know and approve, in which COLLIER railroaded an innocent man to prison:
" That defendant was denied a fair trial because of a continuing course of prosecutorial misconduct (by Salisbury), which was pervasive throughout the entirety of the case, specifically including, but not limited to the following:
A. The assistant prosecutor falsified a police report of interview, to mislead defense counsel to believe that the defendant had been advised of his Miranda rights; the assistant prosecutor withheld exculpatory evidence, and engaged in other serious discovery violations.
B. Invasion of the defense camp, by sending an undercover operative into the Medina County Jail to spy on defendant, and by the prosecutor's listening to attorney-client privileged telephone conversations.
C. The assistant prosecutor disobeyed the court's order to provide the defendant with proper notice of the charge against him so that he could prepare for trial.
D. The assistant prosecutor abused the voire dire process by usurping the Judge's role to instruct the jury on the applicable law.
E. The assistant prosecutor repeatedly misstated the evidence at trial, over the defendant's objections.
F. The assistant prosecutor falsely made improper remarks, not supported by any evidence, implying bad character of the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant did not introduce a character defense, e. g. to lead the jury to believe that the defendant used illegal drugs.
G. The assistant prosecutor denigrated defense counsel.
H. The prosecuting attorney made improper remarks during his closing argument.
I. The assistant prosecutor invented facts no in evidence during his final rebuttal closing argument.
J. The assistant prosecutor intentionally surprised the defense at trial by impermissibly introducing forbidden Rule 404(b)-type evidence, over the defendant's objections and contrary to the law and the assistant prosecutor's assurances to the court and to defense counsel that he would not use such evidence in his case-in-chief. The lack of indicia of reliability, the lack of probative value, the lack of any balancing test by the court, and the lack of any contemporaneous limiting instruction denied the defendant a fair trial.
K. The assistant prosecutor denied the defendant a fair trial by improperly commenting on his exercise of his 5th Amendment right to remain silent and not provide a written statement to his interrogator, who had failed to advise him of his Miranda rights, failed to obtain a waiver of those rights, and who previously refused his three requests to speak with an attorney.
L. The assistant prosecutor, throughout the pre-trial proceedings, taunted the defendant.
M. The assistant prosecutor elicited testimony of the defendant's lay-off, which resulted from the bad economy and was not probative of any issues before the jury. This conduct was designed to embarrass the defendant and prejudice the jury against him by implying that he may have been fired.
N. The assistant prosecutor violated the defendant's right to compulsory process when he failed to present Deputy Douglas Clinage, his agent, for testimony at trial when Clinage had been served by the defense with a trial subpoena commanding his appearance at trial for the production of testimony."
AS CAN BE SEEN FROM THIS LEGAL BRIEF, THAT COLLIER LIKELY FAILED TO READ AT ALL, SALISBURY HAS FALLEN COMPLETELY AND HOPELESSLY IN LOVE WITH MISS CONDUCT.
SO, TOO, HAS COLLIER, AS WILL SHORTLY BE FURTHER DEMONSTRATED IN FILINGS THAT COLLIER HAS COMPLETELY IGNORED SO AS TO RETAIN HIS GRIP ON A VIRTUAL LIFETIME APPOINTMENT TO THE MEDINA COUNTY BENCH, COMPLIMENTS OF CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOLMAN.
IN REALITY, THE ONLY BENCH UPON WHICH COLLIER IS QUALIFIED TO SIT IS LOCATED IN ANY ONE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY PARKS, TO BE SHARED WITH THE PIGEONS AND THE SQUIRRELS!
It will be interesting to see how the Disciplinary Counsel of the Ohio Supreme Court will deal with these and other issues of corruption in the Medina County Courts.
MUCH MORE TO COME ....
No comments:
Post a Comment