CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR IS NOW RESORTING TO HIDING PUBLIC RECORDS IN A FURTHER ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL HIS PERSONAL UNLAWFUL CONDUCT, THE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF "PUBLIUS," ILLEGITIMATE MEDINA "JUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, HOEMAN'S VERY SUBSERVIENT LAPDOG, "WEASELPECKER"COLLIER'S COURT REPORTER, PARAMOUR, MISTRESS, AND MAIN SQUEEZE DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY, AND HOEMAN'S JAGOFF ACCOMPLICES AT THE MEDINA COUNTY BAR & PICKPOCKET ASSN.
THE BLOGGER HAS PREVIOUSLY REVEALED, MUCH TO HOEMAN'S CHAGRIN, THAT "WEASELPECKER'S" MAIN SQUEEZE, COURT REPORTER DONNA GARRITY, OPENLY ADMITTED TO A VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME THAT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN UNLAWFULLY TAMPERED WITH A TRANSCRIPT OF A HEARING BEFORE "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER, HELD ON OCTOBER 1, 2010. IN FACT, HOEMAN WINNOWED OUT 78 PAGES OF THE "OFFICIAL" TRANSCRIPT, LEAVING ONLY A MERE 16 PAGES, ALL WITH GARRITY'S WILLING PARTICIPATION. See prior post at this blog captioned LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER'S MISTRESS, MAIN SQUEEZE, AND COURT REPORTER DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY IMPLICATES CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN IN TRANSCRIPT TAMPERING easily found at http://medinacorruption.blogspot.com/2015/04/lapdog-publius-colliers-mistress-main.html
THE PRECISE CASE, NOW PENDING BEFORE SITTING JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE, APPOINTED BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT AFTER "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER UNLAWFULLY IMPOSED AN EX PARTE PERMANENT INJUNCTION (WITHOUT A HEARING) UPON ONE OF THE VICTIMS OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, IS IDENTIFIED BY MEDINA COUNTY CASE NO. 08CIV0502.
UNTIL TODAY, CASE NO. 08CIV0502 COULD BE READILY FOUND AND ACCESSED AT THE WEBSITE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURT.
TODAY, POOF, IT'S ALL GONE. YOU, THE READER, CAN QUERY THE WEBSITE OF THE MEDINA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS. YOU WILL FIND, AS DID THE BLOGGER, THAT THERE IS SUDDENLY NO RECORD OF CASE NO. 08CIV0502!
WHERE THERE'S SMOKE, THERE'S FIRE!
DINO HOEMAN DOES NOT WANT YOU, THE READERS, AND THE BLOGGER, TO FURTHER REVIEW CASE NO. 08CIV0502 ONLY TO DISCOVER EVEN MORE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY HOEMAN AND HIS JAGOFF ACCOMPLICES.
OF COURSE, HOEMAN REGULARLY HIDES EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO DEFENDANTS, SO WHY NOT HIDE PUBLIC RECORDS AS WELL?
No comments:
Post a Comment