JUVENILES IN MEDINA COUNTY APPARENTLY HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS, AT LEAST ACCORDING TO JUDGE KEVIN DUNN WHO ISSUED AN ALTERED TRANSCRIPT

Shown below is the TWENTY-EIGHTH installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

In the Matter of J.G., Medina County Juvenile Court

Case No. 2014-02DQ-0076, Judge Dunn

Juvenile J.G. was summoned to Medina County Juvenile Court to answer a complaint alleging inciting panic on the unfounded grounds that J.G. had formulated a “hit list.”  J.G.’s mother accompanied her son to the adjudicatory hearing that was conducted before a magistrate on July 15, 2014.  At the conclusion of the adjudicator hearing, the magistrate found J.G. to be a delinquent child by virtue of disorderly conduct, engaging in fighting.

J.G.’s mother chose to appeal the magistrate’s finding with the belief that the prosecutor had failed to present any evidence of any violation of law by her son.  Accordingly, Mrs. Powell, J.G.’s mother went to the Medina County Juvenile Court, requested a complete transcript of J.G.’s adjudicatory hearing, paid the fee for the transcript to the clerk and, in exchange, received three compact discs that the clerk represented to Ms. Powell contained the complete transcript of the hearing.

Mrs. Powell went home and learned that the compact discs were woefully incomplete and failed to present the complete testimony of witnesses at the hearing.

Not satisfied, Mrs. Powell returned to the Medina County Juvenile Court and once again requested and paid for a complete transcript of the adjudicatory hearing.  Once again, a clerk furnished Mrs. Powell with three compact discs that, upon review, were again woefully incomplete, although the content of the second set of compact discs varied from the first set.

Mrs. Powell firmly believes that the juvenile court failed to provide her with a complete transcript of the adjudicatory hearing with the intent to deliberately frustrate her appeal of the magistrate’s finding.

Mrs. Powell has furnished an affidavit, detailing her unsuccessful attempts to obtain a complete transcript of her son’s adjudicatory hearing, attached hereto as Exhibit Twenty-Six.