LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER MOVES TO CONCEAL THE FACT THE SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, TRAINED BY THE KEYSTONE KOPS, MADE THE UNLAWFUL ARREST LACKING PROBABLE CAUSE!

Shown below is the FOURTEENTH installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

G.  Deputy Telatko’s Actual Suppression Testimony

Was Deliberately Deleted From the Record.

Following the line of questioning at Page 179, defense counsel asked Deputy Telatko to specify the precise criminal offense for which he had arrested Defendant on the date of the purported “incident.”  Deputy Telatko, the arresting officer, could not identify the specific offense giving rise to Mr. Hartman’s arrest.  Instead, Deputy Telatko testified, “We arrested him until we could sort it out later.”

Clearly, Deputy Telatko did not have probable cause to arrest Mr. Hartman when at the suppression hearing, even after more than three months following the arrest, he was unable to specify the precise offense for which he arrested the Defendant.

A complete, thorough, and diligent review of the transcript of the suppression testimony of Deputy Telatko has revealed that Telatko’s testimony, “We arrested him until we could sort it out later,” has been deliberately and unlawfully excised from the transcript.

After Mr. Hartman alerted the trial court of this fatal defect in the State’s case in his Motion for Acquittal at Page 4, filed with the trial court on November 23, 2009 (a full 13 months prior to the time the court reporter filed the corrupted transcript,) specifically that the State had failed to establish probable cause for the arrest of the Defendant, Judge Collier took measures to delete Deputy Telatko’s actual testimony from the transcript.

Mr. Hartman’s November 23, 2009, Motion for Acquittal, at Page 4 expressly provides:

Nevertheless, according to arresting officer Frank Telatko, they decided to arrest Mr. Hartman, take him to jail, and “sort it out later,” although they made absolutely no effort to sort out the truth of Kim Leighton’s false alarm. In violation of 2917.32.

Once again, Defendant’s Motion for Acquittal provided a roadmap for Judge Collier to the precise location in the transcript that he needed to alter in order to deprive Mr. Hartman of a fair hearing on appeal.  When the Judge deliberately and unlawfully materially altered Mr. Hartman’s transcript, however, the judge overlooked the fact that Mr. Hartman had previously memorialized the suppression hearing testimony of Deputy Telatko in his Motion for Acquittal.

A copy of Mr. Hartman’s November 23, 2009, Motion for Acquittal, Page 4, memorializing the actual testimony of the suppression testimony of Deputy Telatko, more than 13 months prior to the time that the court reporter filed the corrupted transcript with the Court of Appeals on December 27, 2010, is attached as Exhibit Twelve.