K. The Corrupted Transcript Demonstrates an
Obvious
Deletion
of the Testimony of Roy “Al” Leighton.
The corrupted transcript of the cross-examination of Mr.
Leighton terminates abruptly at Page 265, in the middle of an unfinished line
of questioning by defense counsel.
Moreover, the transcript of Mr. Leighton’s cross-examination terminates
abruptly without defense counsel’s usual and customary, “I have no further
questions.”
The corrupted transcript reflects that the purported end of
defense counsel’s cross-examination of Mr. Leighton ends thusly:
Q. All
right. If that’s not the case, then we
have to look at a different set of facts.
I think you’ll agree with that?
A. I guess.
It is obvious
that defense counsel continued to cross-examine Mr. Leighton concerning “a
different set of facts.” Judge Collier
has deliberately deleted defense
counsel’s cross-examination and Mr. Leighton’s and his testimony exculpatory to Mr. Hartman from the
transcript. This gap is also obvious
because Ms. Cramer was questioning
Leighton, but the Court responds to assistant prosecuting attorney
Salisbury. The transcript is missing the
shift between Ms. Cramer’s cross-examination and Salisbury’s redirect.
A copy Page 265
taken from the corrupted transcript of the testimony given by Mr. Leighton is
appended hereto as Exhibit Eighteen.
PRESTO! LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER MADE THE TESTIMONY ABOUT ANOTHER "SET OF FACTS" JUST DISAPPEAR INTO THIN AIR, LIKE HE AND HIS MAIN SQUEEZE DONNA "HAVE IT YOUR WAY" GARRITY HAVE DONE FOR THE PAST ELEVEN YEARS.
No comments:
Post a Comment