THIS CASE POINTS DIRECTLY AT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN FOR TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE !!!

Shown below is the TWENTY-THIRD installment of the MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ON THE GROUNDS OF PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL BAD FAITH AND MISCONDUCT, which LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER and the Republicrats at the Medina County Courthouse, Mosque & Railroad Station do not want you, the citizens, to see.  You can cross-reference any exhibits to the List of Exhibits by "CLICKING" on the link shown directly below "PAGES" at the upper right-hand corner of the web page:

A.  State v. Jeffery Mack, Medina Case No. 03CR0612

Mr. Jeffery Mack was indicted on December 23, 2003.  Mr. Mack’s indictment cannot be publicly viewed at the website of the Clerk of Medina County Court of Common Pleas so that the details of the indictment cannot be cited here with specificity.  Mr. Mack filed motions to suppress various items of evidence on March 5, 2004.[1]  Judge Collier denied Mr. Mack’s motions to suppress evidence on April 30, 2004.

Interestingly, on August 27, 2004, Judge Collier issued Order 1328/237 providing that “the testimony of Ptl. Steve Hoover may be taken by deposition & used as evidence at trial in this matter.”

The docket in Mr. Mack’s case further reveals a September 1, 2004 entry “WARRANT FOR REMOVAL,” #1329/012, which provides, “Sheriff to transport deft. From Cuyahoga County jail to Medina County Sheriff’s Office for a deposition on 9-08-04 at 9:00 am.”

Mr. Mack attended the deposition of Patrolman Steven Hoover conducted at the Medina County Jail on September 8, 2004.

Having failed to prevail on his motions to suppress, on December 13, 2004 Mr. Mack, according to the docket, appeared before Judge Collier and entered guilty pleas to two counts of aggravated robbery, two counts of repeat violent offender specification, and two counts of misuse of credit cards.[2]

On February 25, 2005, Judge Collier sentenced Mr. Mack to an aggregate term of 23 years imprisonment.

Mr. Mack timely appealed his conviction and sentence, State v. Mack, 9^th Dist. No. 05CA0024-M, 2005-Ohio-6325.

Turning now to the express language of the November 30, 2005 Decision of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, State v. Mack, 9^th Dist. No. 05CA0034-M, 2005-Ohio-6325:

            In the case at hand, Defendant maintains that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to:

            “(1) raise the issue of the altered suppression hearing and videotape deposition transcripts . . . .”  [Emphasis added.]

Regarding Defendant’s allegations of altered evidence, we find no support for his contentions, and thus cannot say that Defendants’ trial counsel prejudiced Defendant for failing to raise an unsubstantiated claim.  Id., at ¶13.

Mr. Mack has furnished an affidavit, with specific citations to the record, averring that the transcript of the deposition testimony of Patrolman Steven Hoover and the transcript of his suppression hearing have been materially altered.

A copy of Mr. Mack’s affidavit is attached hereto as Exhibit Twenty-One.

It is patently clear that, as early as 2003, Judge Collier and his court reported, Donna Garrity, have been deliberately editing and materially altering transcripts of proceedings held before him.

The criminal offense of tampering with transcripts, official records of court proceedings, is so insidious because, in the absence of zealous advocates, the voices of untold numbers of victims of the transcript tampering go unheard and unacknowledged by the Court of Appeals, adding one more injustice done to untold numbers of victims.  Moreover, the average citizen can have absolutely no confidence in the outcome of proceedings where the record has been corrupted and the results are in doubt and under a cloud of suspicion.

---

[1]  The actual date memorializing the suppression hearing does not appear on the docket. It appears from the docket that Judge Collier held a suppression hearing on April 20, 2004 from an ancillary order posted to the docket on April 27, 2004, “Order 1301/504 THE VIDEOTAPE MARKED AND INTRODUCED AT THE SUPPRESSION HEARING HELD 4-20-04 IS HEREBY RELEASED FOR PURPOSES OF COPYING.”

[2] Docket Entry 13/December/2004  CHANGE OF PLEA ENTRY FILED  1346/691-692 Def. informed the Court that his correct name is “Jeffery Mack Lundy.”  The Court granted State’s Motion to strike “Purposely” from “Count II” of indictment. The Deft. Plead “Guilty” to (2) violations of Aggravated Robbery 2911.01(A)(3) (F-1); (2 cts) Repeat Violent Offender Specification 2941.149; and (2 cts) Misuse of Credit Card 2913.21)B)(2) (M-1).  State informed the Court it would recommend a maximum sentence of (23) years.  Def. referred to APD for PSI. Bond set is cont’d. Sentencing is set for 2-14-05 @ 8:30 am. 


A VERY RECENT CASE, STRIKINGLY SIMILAR TO THE CASE OF JEFFERY MACK, IS CURRENTLY PENDING BEFORE LAPDOG "PUBLIUS" COLLIER AND AGAIN POINTS SQUARELY AT CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOEMAN FOR TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, A CRIME UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO!