ACCORDING TO THE VICTIM, THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEY REFERENCED IN A RECENT PRIOR POST, SEEMS TO BE CHIN-DEEP IN SOME SERIOUS MISCONDUCT. YOU SEE, THE JAGOFF ATTORNEY ALLEGEDLY TESTIFIED BEFORE PHILANDERNG, ILLEGITIMATE MEDINA "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER (ANOTHER WELL-PLACED MEMBER OF HOE-MAN'S MEDINA MOB) THAT THE ESTATE OF THE LOCAL DECEASED MAN, WHOSE GRAVE THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY AND OTHER MEMBERS OF HOE-MAN'S MEDINA MOB ROBBED ND THEREAFTER RAPED AND PILLAGED THE ESTATE, HAD BEEN CLOSED AND FILED AT A HEARING HELD BY "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER IN KANGAROO COURTROOM #1 IN OCTOBER 2008.
AS IT TURNS OUT HOWEVER, THE INVENTORY OF ESTATE ASSETS, INCOMPLETE AS IT MAY BE, WAS EVENTUALLY FILED IN THE MEDINA PROBATE COURT IN JUNE 2009, FULLY NINE MONTHS AFTER THE ALLEGED TESTIMONY OF THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEY.
WHAT DO YOU KNOW? A JAGOFF ATTORNEY LYING IN ONE OF "WEASELPECKER'S" CHARADE "HEARINGS" IN HIS KANGAROO COURTROOM #1 OVER AT THE MEDINA COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MOSQUE, BROTHEL & RAILROAD STATION !
IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM, HOWEVER, LYING IN COURT IS NO BIG DEAL. AFTER ALL, "WEASELPECKER" HIMSELF IS A PROVEN LIAR, AS IS CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN AND ALL OF HIS ASS PROSECUTORS. AFTER ALL, THE OFFICIAL MOTTO OF HOE-MAN IS "LIE A LITTLE, LIE A LOT. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?"
INTERESTINGLY, IT IS THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE VERY OCTOBER 2008 HEARING WHICH CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN AND LOCAL JAGOFF ATTORNEY LARRY COURTNEY "EDITED," REMOVING AND DELETING 76 PAGES, IN VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OHIO, FELONY TAMPERING WITH RECORDS AND FELONY TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE.
OF FURTHER INTEREST IS THE FACT THAT AT THE OCTOBER 2008 HEARING, WITHOUT HEARING TESTIMONY OF THE VICTIM(S) OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER ORDERED THE ENFORCEMENT OF AN UNSIGNED PURPORTED "AGREEMENT" BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO WHICH NONE OF THE PARTIES CONSENTED OR AGREED, ACCORDING TO THE VICTIM.
ONE HAS TO WONDER JUST HOW MUCH OF A KICKBACK THAT "WEASELPECKER" RECEIVED FOR PULLING OFF THAT STUNT.
WHILE THERE HAS BEEN SOME LEGAL WRANGLING BEFORE VISITING JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE, WHO HAS FAILED TO TIMELY RULE ON MOTIONS AND HEARINGS, MEDINA CASE NO. 08CIV0502. READERS ARE FREE TO REVIEW THE DOCKET IN THIS CASE AT THE WEBSITE OF THE CLERK OF MEDINA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
REVIEWING THE DOCKET IN MEDINA CASE NO. 08CIV0502, READERS WILL FIND THAT ON FEBRUARY 18, 2014 THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME FILED A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. THE VICTIM'S MOTION INCLUDED A COPY OF A PROBATIVE OFFICIAL REPORT OF INVESTIGATION BY HINCKLEY POLICE SERGEANT DANIEL HUFF.
A REVIEW OF THE CASE DOCKET REVEALS THAT THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEY FAILED TO ANSWER OR OPPOSE THE VICTIM'S MOTION.
FURTHER REVIEWING THE DOCKET IN MEDINA CASE NO. 08CIV0502, READERS WILL FIND THAT ON MARCH 9, 2016 THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS PER RUE 11 BEFORE VISITING JUDGE PATRICIA COSGROVE .
THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEY FAILED TO ANSWER OR OPPOSE THE MARCH 9, 2016 MOTION TO DISMISS.
TO DATE, JUDGE COSGROVE HAS FAILED TO RULE ON EITHER OF THESE TWO MOTIONS.
ALTHOUGH JUDGE COSGROVE HAS HELD RULINGS ON THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED MOTIONS IN ABEYANCE, SHE HAS SCHEDULED A HEARING ON MOTION OF THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEY TO HOLD THE VICTIM IN CONTEMPT OF AN INVALID UNSIGNED PURPORTED "STIPULATED" INJUNCTION UNLAWFULLY IMPOSED BY CORRUPT PHILANDERING "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER BEFORE IMMEDIATELY BEFORE HE RECUSED HIMSELF FROM THIS CASE "TO AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF FURTHER IMPROPRIETY."
FOLLOWING IS A RECENT EMAIL COMMUNICATION FROM THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME TO VISITING JUDGE COSGROVE:
From: Gregg Depew <greggdepew01@gmail.com>Date: Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:50 PM
Subject: upcoming phone conference
To: Patricia Cosgrove <pcosgrove1@yahoo.com>
Your Honor, FYI at the 1-28-16 default hearing the medina county prosecutor appeared and gave oral testimony that the HPD report from Sgt Huff was infact real. In 2008 local attorney Forrest Thompson was retained by co defendant's and filed a declaratory judgement against Brad Depew for POA fraud in the Probate Court. The Probate Court was to have a hearing on the Matter but do to the Civil Order issued by this Court the Administrator was Ordered by The Civil Court to enter an incomplete inventory.. Mr Bernlohr testified before Judge Collier the Inventory was complete, when he still had a pending poa fraud case in probate that would increase the value of the estate hundreds of thousands of dollars and implicate Brad Depew, The pretrial statement filed by Bernlohr in this very case states this fact. All this case was designed to do was gain an upperhand in a pending probate fraud case. Forrest Thompson was sworn in last week as Medina County Prosecutor and his bond will take effect 1-01-17. I have already conferred with his staff and he does have a conflict. Do to the Criminal nature of the Huff report and the MCPO stating to the Court on 1-28-16 of this fact I am requesting this Court forward the report to Summit County Prosecutor to prosecute the perjury charge and vacate the fraudulent CPO. I will be filing a 55C motion shortly. I was assured that MCPO will forward the report to an outside prosecutor in early January if the Court has not yet done so.
Thank you Gregg Depew Pro Se,
Cc Mark Bernlohr
THERE ARE SOME REAL NUGGETS TO BE FOUND IN THE ABOVE EMAIL MESSAGE TO JUDGE COSGROVE!
FIRSTLY, THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME ADVISED THE JUDGE HE INTENDS TO FILE A RULE 55 MOTION WITHIN THE REASONABLY NEAR FUTURE!
PERHAPS WE SHOULD TAKE A LOOK AT RULE 55 OF THE OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE:
RULE 55. DefaultBINGO! UNDER THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE VICTIM IS ENTITLED TO DEFAULT JUDGMENT WHERE THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEY FAILED TO ANSWER AND OPPOSE THE VICTIM'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS!
(A) Entry of judgment. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules, the party entitled to a judgment by default shall apply in writing or orally to the court therefor; but no judgment by default shall be entered against a minor or an incompetent person unless represented in the action by a guardian or other such representative who has appeared therein. If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action, he (or, if appearing by representative, his representative) shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least seven days prior to the hearing on such application. If, in order to enable the court to enter judgment or to carry it into effect, it is necessary to take an account or to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment by evidence or to make an investigation of any other matter, the court may conduct such hearings or order such references as it deems necessary and proper and shall when applicable accord a right of trial by jury to the parties.
NEXT, AND JUST AS IMPORTANT, IF JUDGE COSGROVE FAILS TO FORWARD THE OFFICIAL INVESTIGATIVE REPORT OF HINCKLEY POLICE SGT. DANIEL HUFF TO THE SUMMIT COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, THE HONORABLE FORREST THOMPSON, THE INCOMING MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR, WILL DO SO AFTER ASSUMING OFFICE!
WHAT A BREATH OF FRESH AIR TO HAVE AN HONEST MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR, FOR A CHANGE !!!
UP NEXT AT THIS BLOG: THE CHRONICLES OF "WEASELPECKER" COLLIER'S DEATH-DEFYING SASQUATCH HUNT.
No comments:
Post a Comment