VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME, ORCHESTRATED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN, DEMANDS PROOF FROM ONE OF THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS !

AS HAS BEEN SHOWN AT THIS BLOG, THE VICTIM(S) OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME ORCHESTRATED BY CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY PROSECUTOR DINO HOE-MAN (WITH EMPHASIS ON "HOE"), AND FACILITATED BY CORRUPT ILLEGITIMATE "jUDGE WEASELPECKER" COLLIER AND CORRUPT MEDINA COUNTY AUDITOR AND THIEF MIKE "THE PERV" KOVACK, HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO THE  MEDINA COUNTY JUDICIAL CIRCLE JERK FOR THE LONGEST TIME IN THE HOPES THAT THESE VICTIMS WOULD SIMPLY GO AWAY, ENABLING THESE CROOKS TO SWEEP THE ENTIRE MATTER UNDER THE RUG IN THEIR USUAL AND CUSTOMARY FASHION IN THE MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM..

THAT, OF COURSE, IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!

A VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME HAS SENT A DISCOVERY DEMAND TO ONE OF THE ADVERSE JAGOFF ATTORNEYS INVOLVED IN THIS FRAUD SCHEME, SHOWN BELOW.

From: Gregg Depew <greggdepew01@gmail.com>
Date: December 4, 2016 at 10:33:59 AM EST
To: "Bernlohr, Mark" <mwbernlohr@jacksonkelly.com>
Subject: Upcoming Phone Conference

Mr. Bernlohr,

As you are aware there is an upcoming phone conference that I requested that I wish to talk to you about.  I have been recently informed by IRS Criminal Investigative Unit that the recent ruling by Probate has now put the IRS 1041 from for my late father's estate in question as being inaccurate.  As an heir to the estate the IRS states I must claim the missing Corporate assets of Depew and Medina Drilling and also the "correct" value of the real estate (the $800,00 amount you filed with probate), as a loss on my 2016 taxes or face evasion charges along with your client.  The Medina County Treasurer and Auditor supplied notarized public records to me showing the County requested an investigation after the Treasurer and his prosecutor with him witnessed Brad Depew testify at hearing on 10-01-10 regarding tax valuations with conflicting statements and notified Ohio Tax and also Medina Sheriff.  Your client's own statements before Judge Collier and his direct retaliation to me notified authorities that I had information or some type of knowledge of criminal activity that you and Brad Depew wanted suppressed.  I am requesting you supply credible discovery/evidence to verify your opening statements from the dictated DV testimony entered as an exhibit from your May 2013 Motion to Show Cause.  

The Auditor has recently been found by Medina [CITY] Prosecutor and Ohio Tax that he Violated several confidentiality laws for his involvement.  The issues with the Police were verified in HPD's 2012 report that the Medina Prosecutor deemed to have no subject matter in the 08civ0502 hearing on 01-28-16.  You never objected and that report states an unprosecuted perjury charge for falsely representing a 2009 Hinckley incident that I not only was cleared of but your client called HPD to retract.  I require the following evidence to support your claims, 1.a complete inventory of equipment from said companies, transfer date, from George Depew to Brad Depew dated after November 2007 to match County finding with Ohio Tax.  All involvement in the Mangan vs Landmark 4LLC lawsuit that was on Channel 8, 5, 3, Medina Gazette, Akron Beacon, and plain Dealer that Brad and Fred Depew BOTH were deposed.  All Summit HD and ODH records from 5300 Hawkins Rd. Richfield Twp. regarding Bond Claims, all ODH registrations from Medina Drilling dated 1993 to present.  All ODH registrations For Depew Drilling from 1976 to present.  All Depew and Medina Drilling officer meeting minutes from 1996 to 2007 and stock transfer filings and agent filings to that date.  All rulings showing bond issues/falsify from 2001 to present.  I think you understand that I will go over your evidence at the time of the Phone Conference as you and your client are obviously unable to support your CPO claims.  

The mediation agreement that you authored and you personally testified to clearly states any probate assets found were to be split by the heirs.  Your Client and yourself are violating the Order and have after multiple hearings failed to provide credible evidence of legal ownership of anything.  Worse, I have a responsibility to pay taxes on what you and your client have not only concealed from me but also tax investigators.  

I want to bring closure to this once and for all and if you are unable to prove ownership through a legal transfer prior to 2007 of the businesses, (I remind you that I have the Ohio Tax investigation records sent to the Medina Prosecutor showing the businesses as "inheritance" dated 11-2007), the transfer of the $300,000 to George Depew for the real estate to comply with Ohio Law, and that you are aware that the CPO testimony was deemed perjured by Brad Depew as the HPD report that Prosecutor Ritcher  testified to as criminal and no bearing to the civil proceedings I will hold you and your Clients in contempt.  I also require you to remove the CPO prior to the phone conference as it was an obvious attempt to conceal probate assets that the Mediation agreement and State and Federal Law state I have full right to.  If the CPO is not removed by the time of the hearing I will have your actions reviewed by the Court as possible rule 11 issues.  I expect to have the discovery submitted to me by 12-8-2016.  It is likely that I will request more discovery from you prior to the phone conference.

Respectfully, Gregg Depew, Pro Se

THE RESPONSE FROM THE ADVERSE ATTORNEY?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Bernlohr, Mark <mwbernlohr@jacksonkelly.com> wrote:

Here is just one of many examples of things I get from mr depew on a sporadic basis.  We are requesting that the mr depew be found in violation of the permanent injunction and that mr depew be ordered to cease this conduct accordingly and the permanent injunction (and cpo which incorporates the permanent injunction) be enforced.  Thank you. 

AN EMAIL TO THE "SITTING JUDGE" ASKING HER TO MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO, THE SAME OLD MEDINA COUNTY "JUSTUS" SYSTEM JUDICIAL CIRCLE JERK!

THE VICTIM'S REPLY, SHOWN BELOW.

From: Gregg Depew <greggdepew01@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Upcoming Phone Conference
To: "Bernlohr, Mark" <mwbernlohr@jacksonkelly.com>

Mr. Bernlohr, I expect to receive my discovery that I requested  in a timely manner.

respectfully, Gregg Depew Pro Se

WHAT, OH WHAT, WILL THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY DO AND, MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHAT WILL THE "VISITING JUDGE" PATRICIA COSGROVE DO?

READERS SHOULD BEAR IN MIND THAT JUDGE COSGROVE PREVIOUSLY DENIED A REQUEST OF THE VICTIM OF THE MASSIVE FRAUD SCHEME TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE THIS FRAUD SCHEME.

IT SEEM TO THE BLOGGER THAT IT IS TIME FOR THIS JAGOFF ATTORNEY, AMONG OTHERS, TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP, AND LET "JUSTUS" PROCEED!